Tuesday, November 15, 2005

 

Racist Alan Jones

I'll admit it. I watch Alan Jones do his little hate diatribe nearly every morning on the 'Today Show' on channel nine. It's on while I eat my breakfast, and often gives me a laugh as I munch on my cereal.

But not yesterday morning. Oh no. Yesterday, AJ crossed a line that, whilst I'm sure he's crossed before, I don't recall ever actually seeing him cross. He's danced along the edge of racist, bigoted ejaculation before, but not quite like he did on Monday the 14th of November. On Monday, he said:

"Good morning to Karl and Tracy and to all of you where ever you are beginning a new week.

While the focus here has been on the terrorist threat, no-one can be unconcerned by the pictures we see every night of what is happening in France.

And any number of theories are being advanced.

Big cutbacks in recent years in government spending on jobs programs.

50,000 young people said to have lost places in jobs programs.

Or, the failure of the so-called republican model to integrate immigrant communities.

There is no affirmative action policy in France for immigrants such as housing and employment programs, especially for the newly arrived.

Or, in a world where the working week can be very short and the minimum wage very high: people in work are protected and nothing is done for those out of work.Labour is more expensive.

You can't fire for poor performance.

So this looks good only if you happen to have a job.

France is the country which legislated for the 35 hour week because there would be more jobs to go around.

But unemployment in some of those rioting areas is the worst in 20
years at almost 20%.

All of that offers convenient explanations.But it's a fair way off the mark.

750 neighbourhoods housing about 5 million people across France are severely disadvantaged.

But just because you are disadvantaged, you don't torch cars and petrol bomb police and sponsor hideous violence."

So, we come back to what we are not meant to say.

There is a large Muslim population in France which has not integrated into the country into which they were made welcome.

You have heard this before.

Immigrants in France are told to assimilate, not integrate.

So when second and third generation immigrants from Algeria and sub-Saharan Africa look at the ranks of the professions, they are not there.

All of this has been used to explain away the pictures of a country virtually at
civil war.

But surely there is a common thread for the problems in France, England, Denmark, Holland, Germany, Belgium and now Australia.

Islamic youth.

Not all, but Islamic youth, nonetheless.

Never mind the unemployment and the rest of the excuses.

Why is it that across the world this is the one factor in all these problems?

Yet, you will get academics and so-called intellectuals trying to shame us into believing that we are the cause of these problems.

But surely all these countries can't be the same in terms of racism, unemployment and integration.

They can't all be responsible for Muslim youths trying to destroy the host country that gave their parents a new start in life.

So the notion that the host country is somehow to blame is a nonsense.

Or, is it a very clever tactic that Islam is using to weaken the resolve of politicians: to incorporate the support of so-called left wing intellectuals and community leaders to deflect the blame away from the Islamic community and place it at the feet of the silent majority.

John Howard at the weekend said Islamic leaders must weed these people out.

Suddenly John Howard is being criticised.

If we continue to stand common sense on its head, we may be left standing on our heads ourselves.


Comments:
What a prick.

There's a logic flaw there too - he's saying that everyone has the same problem as France despite everyone having different circumstances, so it can't be France's fault.

But I don't see us having riots in the streets like France does. Or anywhere else.

Freakin idiot.
 
Time ran an article on the riots. They quoted the rise of islam in these estates as a direct result of disaffected youth unable to get jobs or adequate schooling in a passively hostile culture for being black turning to religion as a way to get through the day. Either that or indulge in petty crime or watch TV.

Alan Jones is a hateful nob who'd probably rather set himself on fire than sit down with a council of moderate islamic clerics gently explaining the issues that currently bedevil moderate islam across the world.
 
A study was done in France where they sent identical resumes named with either French or muslim-sounding names to various employers. The ones with the muslim names got called back for interviews at about 1/4 the rate of the ones with French names.

An identical study was done in the US, where they sent out identical resumes with african-american or white-sounding names. Guess which ones didn't receive any calls back?

Of course, Alan Jones would just put that down to african americans and muslims being inherently inferior (in a non racist way of course). Prick. It really bugs me that what is essentially hate speech gets such a free reign in our media, when if a muslim cleric was proclaiming muslim superiority there'd be calls to deport him.
 
I think that Jones' suggestion "...is it a very clever tactic that Islam is using to weaken the resolve of politicians..." makes Islam seem like some sort of sentient gestalt or hive mind. Which it isn't. This is a confluence of circumstances.

No doubt some people of every stripe are attempting to use it to their advantage: Muslim clerics seeking to increase their flocks among the discontent, anti-democracy Muslim demagogues seeking to turn discontent into destruction, conservative commentators seeking to reverse multi-culturalism by raising the specter of civil war.

It really bugs me that what is essentially hate speech gets such a free reign in our media...

Sarah, remember that we *don't want* more controls on free speech here. That means we have to put up with people saying things we disagree with...

The solutions to French problems strikes me as the usual ones: a mix of outreach and law enforcement, while developing programs to reduce discontent among the new citizens of France. It's not rocket science. Mind you, this doesn't sound sexy, and might easily be discarded for flashy but less effective ideas from either the left or the right.

Jones seems to be arguing that France's problems are due to the criminal behaviour of group comprised of immigrants and the descendants of immigrants, who happen to be muslim. He draws a rather longer bow by trying to compare the problems in France to those in other countries, and certainly that falls flat where Australia concerned. He's not wrong on the facts, only on their relevancy. The religion of the rioters seems to me to be irrelevant, despite its commonality, because it's not a motivating factor. The ethnic origins of the rioters is relevant only in a descriptive sense, because it could only be a motivating factor at second or third-hand - ethnic origins and prejudice leading to poverty leading to discontent leading to rioting. Make that fourth-hand.

Seems to me that France doesn't have a muslim problem. It has a crime problem, stemming from a poverty and education problem - a lack of it for some people, that is.
 
Seems to me that France doesn't have a muslim problem. It has a crime problem, stemming from a poverty and education problem - a lack of it for some people, that is.

Got it in one man. Except, try and explain that to a Jones listener...:)
 
I'm not advocating controls on free speech. By 'free reign' I mean that no-one, including our politicians, has the guts to call Alan Jones racist scum and refuse to go on his radio show or have anything to do with him. His diatribes go unquestioned and unchecked, except by the odd spot on mediawatch. I'm all for free speech, but I believe that people like Alan Jones should be given the same treatment as fanatical imams and holocaust deniers. Because Alan Jones is considered politically powerful, however, he can do and say whatever he likes, and politicians will continue to suck up to him- free reign.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?